Registry › Compare › Peekaboo vs Skyvern

Peekaboo vs Skyvern

Both are Grade A and 3.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence. Note: Peekaboo's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A Peekaboo 90.0

Peekaboo is a macOS CLI & optional MCP server that enables AI agents to capture screenshots of applications, or the entire system, with optional visual question answering through local or remote AI models.

openclaw/Peekaboo · #21 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Peekaboo doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Skyvern 87.0

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #60 overall · #7 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+1.5Adoption: 1.6k weekly downloads against 1.5k
+0.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 6.8
+0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 6.8
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

21.0

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +0.7

21.7

14.3

TransparencySkyvern +0.5

14.8

13.2

AdoptionSkyvern +1.5

14.7

+3.5

Runtime calibrationPeekaboo +5.7

-2.2

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Peekaboo and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	90.0	87.0
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#21	#60
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#3	#7
GitHub stars	5.3k	23.2k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.8 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	1k/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	21.0	21.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.3	14.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	13.2	14.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	extensions	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Peekaboo profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →