Openzim MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Openzim MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Openzim MCP and XcodeBuildMCP are tied on HVTrust at 82.6/100. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Openzim MCPcameronrye/openzim-mcp | XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 82.6 | 82.6 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #62 | #63 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #7 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 117 | 6.3k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 10d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.4 / 10 | 5.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 626/wk | 65k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.9 | 16.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.1 | 12.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.9 | 14.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.7 | 15.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →