RegistryCompare › OpenScience vs Vibe-Trading

OpenScience vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenScience and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OpenScience leads on trust — 83.0/100 (Grade A) vs 62.3/100 (Grade C), a 20.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 83.0 62.3
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #100 #534
Rank in Research & Data #5 #10
GitHub stars 3.6k 33.4k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 9k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.8 7.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.8 10.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Cohere, DeepSeek, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → OpenScience profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →