RegistryCompare › OpenScience vs Unstructured

OpenScience vs Unstructured

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenScience and Unstructured, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Unstructured leads on trust — 86.2/100 (Grade A) vs 78.7/100 (Grade B), a 7.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured
HVTrust score 78.7 86.2
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #69 #39
Rank in Research & Data #4 #2
GitHub stars 3.3k 15.3k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 6.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 3k/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.9 20.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.5 14.2
Maintenance / 20 19.9 13.8
Adoption / 20 13.0 18.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Cohere, Google Gemini, … 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → OpenScience profile Unstructured profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →