OpenMausBot vs Swarms
OpenMausBot leads on trust: 83.8/100 (Grade A) against 72.9/100 (Grade B), a 10.9-point gap. OpenMausBot leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance; Swarms leads on transparency.
Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use
Choose OpenMausBot if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
- +1.9Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none
The Enterprise-Grade Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework. Website: https://swarms.ai
Choose Swarms if transparency matters most.
- +1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 4.2
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenMausBot and Swarms, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | OpenMausBotmilind-soni/OpenMausBot | Swarmskyegomez/swarms |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 83.8 | 72.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #107 | #293 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #2 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | 7.2k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.2 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 2k/wk | 2k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 14.4 | 12.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.1 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.3 | 13.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 4 — Anthropic, Groq, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | marketplace |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →