OpenLLMetry vs Promptfoo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenLLMetry and Promptfoo, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenLLMetry leads on trust — 83.2/100 (Grade A) vs 75.3/100 (Grade B), a 7.9-point gap. Note: OpenLLMetry's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | OpenLLMetrytraceloop/openllmetry | Promptfoopromptfoo/promptfoo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 83.2 | 75.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #58 | #86 |
| Rank in Observability & Evaluation | #3 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 7.4k | 24.1k |
| Last updated | 4d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.7 / 10 | — |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 527k/wk | 384k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.9 | 7.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.2 | 8.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 11.7 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.9 | 18.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 9 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
OpenLLMetry profile
Promptfoo profile
More Observability & Evaluation →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →