RegistryCompare › OpenHands vs Qwen Code

OpenHands vs Qwen Code

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenHands and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Qwen Code leads on trust — 88.2/100 (Grade A) vs 77.7/100 (Grade B), a 10.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OpenHandsOpenHands/OpenHands Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code
HVTrust score 77.7 88.2
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #114 #21
Rank in Coding Agents #8 #3
GitHub stars 86.0k 27.6k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 4.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.8M/wk 93k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.8 18.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.4 12.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 17.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → OpenHands profile Qwen Code profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →