RegistryCompare › OpenClaw vs Stagehand

OpenClaw vs Stagehand

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenClaw and Stagehand, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Stagehand leads on trust — 85.9/100 (Grade A) vs 76.4/100 (Grade B), a 9.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OpenClawopenclaw/openclaw Stagehandbrowserbase/stagehand
HVTrust score 76.4 85.9
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #68 #33
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #5 #2
GitHub stars 383.8k 23.6k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 5.0 / 10
License NOASSERTION MIT
Downloads 3.4M/wk 1.1M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.5 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.6 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Firecrawl, … 7 — Anthropic, Browserbase, DeepSeek, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions extensions
Provenance drift Warning Match
Open in the live compare tool → OpenClaw profile Stagehand profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →