OpenClaw vs Skyvern
Both are Grade A and 4.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. OpenClaw leads on adoption; Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
The AI that really does things. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞
Choose OpenClaw if adoption matters most.
- +5.3Adoption: 2.1M weekly downloads against 1.4k
Automate browser based workflows with AI
Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +1.8Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 5.8
- +1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 5.8
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenClaw and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | OpenClawopenclaw/openclaw | SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 90.8 | 86.8 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #18 | #69 |
| Rank in Browser & Computer Use | #2 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 392.7k | 23.2k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.8 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | 2.1M/wk | 1k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.8 | 21.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.4 | 14.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 14.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … | 5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →