OpenClaw vs Peekaboo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenClaw and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenClaw leads on trust — 87.0/100 (Grade A) vs 74.7/100 (Grade B), a 12.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | OpenClawopenclaw/openclaw | Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 87.0 | 74.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #32 | #101 |
| Rank in Browser & Computer Use | #3 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 387.7k | 5.1k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.2 / 10 | 6.2 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Downloads | 3.4M/wk | 2k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 14.0 | 11.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.9 | 13.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 13.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Mistral AI, … | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →