Registry › Compare › OpenClaw vs Peekaboo

OpenClaw vs Peekaboo

Both are Grade A and 1.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. OpenClaw leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; Peekaboo leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A OpenClaw 91.1

The AI that really does things. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞

openclaw/openclaw · #16 overall · #1 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose OpenClaw if adoption matters most.

+6.8Adoption: 3.7M weekly downloads against 1.5k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A Peekaboo 90.0

Peekaboo is a macOS CLI & optional MCP server that enables AI agents to capture screenshots of applications, or the entire system, with optional visual question answering through local or remote AI models.

openclaw/Peekaboo · #21 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Peekaboo if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 96%
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 5.9

Where they differ

19.7

Safety / IntegrityPeekaboo +1.3

21.0

13.5

TransparencyPeekaboo +0.8

14.3

20.0

AdoptionOpenClaw +6.8

13.2

-0.1

Runtime calibrationPeekaboo +3.6

+3.5

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenClaw and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	OpenClawopenclaw/openclaw	Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo
HVTrust score	91.1	90.0
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#16	#21
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#1	#3
GitHub stars	391.6k	5.3k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.9 / 10	6.8 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	3.7M/wk	1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.7	21.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.5	14.3
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	20.0	13.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Mistral AI, …	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	extensions	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → OpenClaw profile Peekaboo profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →