RegistryCompare › OpenAI Agents SDK (JS) vs PydanticAI

OpenAI Agents SDK (JS) vs PydanticAI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OpenAI Agents SDK (JS) and PydanticAI, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OpenAI Agents SDK (JS) leads on trust — 89.2/100 (Grade A) vs 87.1/100 (Grade A), a 2.1-point gap. Note: OpenAI Agents SDK (JS)'s evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal OpenAI Agents SDK (JS)openai/openai-agents-js PydanticAIpydantic/pydantic-ai
HVTrust score 89.2 87.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #18 #28
Rank in Agent Frameworks #5 #7
GitHub stars 3.6k 19.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 6.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 1.1M/wk 8.0M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.5 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.8 14.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.6 19.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 8 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → OpenAI Agents SDK (JS) profile PydanticAI profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →