Registry › Compare › open-science vs OpenScience

open-science vs OpenScience

OpenScience leads on trust: 82.4/100 (Grade A) against 62.4/100 (Grade C), a 20.0-point gap. OpenScience leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

C open-science 62.4

The open-source AI research workbench for scientific research and agent workflows. Local-first, model-agnostic desktop app with extensible skills, MCP tools and connectors, Python/R execution and traceable artifacts for reproducible research on macOS, Windows and Linux.

aipoch/open-science · #556 overall · #9 Research & Data · coverage C (2/5)

open-science doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A OpenScience 82.4

The open-source AI workbench for scientific research

synthetic-sciences/openscience · #115 overall · #5 Research & Data · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenScience if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 3.9
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.7Adoption
+1.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 3.9

Where they differ

9.9

Safety / IntegrityOpenScience +7.4

17.3

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenScience +7.2

18.0

11.8

TransparencyOpenScience +1.4

13.2

8.9

AdoptionOpenScience +4.7

13.6

+1.0

Runtime calibrationopen-science +0.7

+0.3

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of open-science and OpenScience, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	open-scienceaipoch/open-science	OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience
HVTrust score	62.4	82.4
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#556	#115
Rank in Research & Data	#9	#5
GitHub stars	4.9k	3.6k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	3.9 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	6k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.9	17.3
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	11.8	13.2
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	8.9	13.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	1 — Anthropic	7 — Anthropic, Cohere, DeepSeek, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	marketplace	plugins
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → open-science profile OpenScience profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →