oh-my-pi vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code leads on trust: 88.6/100 (Grade A) against 83.3/100 (Grade A), a 5.3-point gap. oh-my-pi leads on adoption; Qwen Code leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Choose oh-my-pi if adoption matters most.
- +0.8Adoption: 351.6k weekly downloads against 145k
An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
Choose Qwen Code if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +4.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 18%
- +0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.4 against 4.8
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of oh-my-pi and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | oh-my-pican1357/oh-my-pi | Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 83.3 | 88.6 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #116 | #53 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #8 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 37.6k | 28.9k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.8 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 352k/wk | 145k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 14.4 | 19.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.6 | 13.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.4 | 17.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 5 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Perplexity, … | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →