Neo vs Tambo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Neo and Tambo, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Neo leads on trust — 89.3/100 (Grade A) vs 78.8/100 (Grade B), a 10.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Neoneomjs/neo | Tambotambo-ai/tambo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.3 | 78.8 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #20 | #154 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #1 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 3.3k | 11.2k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.2 / 10 | 5.3 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 5k/wk | 5k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.2 | 19.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.8 | 13.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 11.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.3 | 14.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | — | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →