Neo vs OpenUI
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Neo and OpenUI, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenUI leads on trust — 86.2/100 (Grade A) vs 85.4/100 (Grade A), a 0.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Neoneomjs/neo | OpenUIthesysdev/openui |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.4 | 86.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #38 | #32 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #2 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | 8.2k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.7 / 10 | 5.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 5k/wk | 11k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.5 | 19.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 12.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.4 | 14.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | — |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI | 1 — OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →