NeMo Guardrails vs PentestAgent
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of NeMo Guardrails and PentestAgent, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
NeMo Guardrails leads on trust — 72.0/100 (Grade B) vs 56.4/100 (Grade C), a 15.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | NeMo GuardrailsNVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails | PentestAgentGH05TCREW/pentestagent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 72.0 | 56.4 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #124 | #398 |
| Rank in Security & Guardrails | #4 | #11 |
| GitHub stars | 7.0k | 3.0k |
| Last updated | today | 14d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.3 / 10 | 6.1 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Downloads | 79k/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.9 | 9.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.9 | 13.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.6 | 14.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.8 | 8.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 4 — Anthropic, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI, … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | — |
Open in the live compare tool →
NeMo Guardrails profile
PentestAgent profile
More Security & Guardrails →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →