RegistryCompare › n8n vs Trigger.dev

n8n vs Trigger.dev

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of n8n and Trigger.dev, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

n8n leads on trust — 91.3/100 (Grade A) vs 90.5/100 (Grade A), a 0.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal n8nn8n-io/n8n Trigger.devtriggerdotdev/trigger.dev
HVTrust score 91.3 90.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #5 #7
Rank in Workflow Platforms #1 #2
GitHub stars 196.5k 15.6k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10 7.0 / 10
License NOASSERTION Apache-2.0
Downloads 224.2M/wk 608k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.6 21.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.0 14.4
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 17.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 5 — Anthropic, Browserbase, OpenAI, … 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → n8n profile Trigger.dev profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →