Mistral Vibe vs oh-my-pi
Both are Grade A and 2.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Mistral Vibe leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; oh-my-pi leads on maintenance and adoption.
Minimal CLI coding agent by Mistral
Choose Mistral Vibe if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +4.1Safety / Integrity: 80% of recent commits signed, against 18%
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.8
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Choose oh-my-pi if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +3.8Maintenance
- +2.1Adoption: 351.6k weekly downloads against 318.8k
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Mistral Vibe and oh-my-pi, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Mistral Vibemistralai/mistral-vibe | oh-my-pican1357/oh-my-pi |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.6 | 83.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #90 | #116 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #6 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 5.3k | 37.6k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.6 / 10 | 4.8 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 319k/wk | 352k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.5 | 14.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 12.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 16.1 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.3 | 18.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 1 — Mistral AI | 5 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Perplexity, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →