RegistryCompare › Mem0 vs Qdrant

Mem0 vs Qdrant

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Mem0 and Qdrant, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Mem0 leads on trust — 86.8/100 (Grade A) vs 75.9/100 (Grade B), a 10.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Mem0mem0ai/mem0 Qdrantqdrant/qdrant
HVTrust score 86.8 75.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #37 #134
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #3 #8
GitHub stars 64.6k 34.4k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 5.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 812k/wk 2.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.4 11.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.2 12.8
Maintenance / 20 19.2 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.4 19.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 14 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … 1 — Qdrant
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Partial Partial
Open in the live compare tool → Mem0 profile Qdrant profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →