Registry › Compare › mcp-proxy vs MCP TypeScript SDK

mcp-proxy vs MCP TypeScript SDK

MCP TypeScript SDK leads on trust: 94.5/100 (Grade A) against 84.5/100 (Grade A), a 10.0-point gap. MCP TypeScript SDK leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A mcp-proxy 84.5

A bridge between Streamable HTTP and stdio MCP transports

sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy · #101 overall · #7 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

mcp-proxy doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A MCP TypeScript SDK 94.5

The official TypeScript SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients

modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · #2 overall · #1 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose MCP TypeScript SDK if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 50%
+4.6Adoption: 65.4M weekly downloads against 222.8k
+2.0Maintenance
+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.9 against 5.2

Where they differ

16.5

Safety / IntegrityMCP TypeScript SDK +4.6

21.1

12.9

TransparencyMCP TypeScript SDK +1.5

14.4

16.7

MaintenanceMCP TypeScript SDK +2.0

18.7

15.4

AdoptionMCP TypeScript SDK +4.6

20.0

+5.0

Runtime calibrationmcp-proxy +2.7

+2.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of mcp-proxy and MCP TypeScript SDK, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	mcp-proxysparfenyuk/mcp-proxy	MCP TypeScript SDKmodelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk
HVTrust score	84.5	94.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#101	#2
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#7	#1
GitHub stars	2.8k	13.5k
Last updated	today	2d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.2 / 10	6.9 / 10
License	MIT	NOASSERTION
Downloads	223k/wk	65.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	16.5	21.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.9	14.4
Maintenance / 20	16.7	18.7
Adoption / 20	15.4	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → mcp-proxy profile MCP TypeScript SDK profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →