Registry › Compare › MaiBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

MaiBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 87.4/100 (Grade A) against 58.7/100 (Grade C), a 28.7-point gap. MaiBot leads on maintenance; Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

C MaiBot 58.7

MaiSaka, an LLM-based intelligent agent, is a digital lifeform devoted to understanding you and interacting in the style of a real human. She does not pursue perfection, nor does she seek efficiency; instead, she values warmth, authenticity, and genuine connection.

Mai-with-u/MaiBot · #739 overall · #7 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

Choose MaiBot if maintenance matters most.

+0.9Maintenance

A Qwen Audio Agent 87.4

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #72 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+13.2Safety / Integrity: 90% of recent commits signed, against 7%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+3.1Adoption
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.5 against 5.2

Where they differ

6.9

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +13.2

20.1

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2

18.0

12.9

TransparencyQwen Audio Agent +1.1

14.0

20.0

MaintenanceMaiBot +0.9

19.1

9.2

AdoptionQwen Audio Agent +3.1

12.3

-1.1

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +5.0

+3.9

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MaiBot and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	MaiBotMai-with-u/MaiBot	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score	58.7	87.4
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#739	#72
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#7	#3
GitHub stars	6.9k	3.1k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.2 / 10	6.5 / 10
License	GPL-3.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	886/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	6.9	20.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.9	14.0
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.1
Adoption / 20	9.2	12.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → MaiBot profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →