RegistryCompare › MaiBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

MaiBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MaiBot and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust — 82.9/100 (Grade A) vs 56.7/100 (Grade C), a 26.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal MaiBotMai-with-u/MaiBot Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score 56.7 82.9
Evidence grade C A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #452 #66
Rank in Voice & Conversational #7 #3
GitHub stars 5.9k 2.3k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10 5.5 / 10
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 6.1 16.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.0 13.2
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 9.0 12.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → MaiBot profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →