LiveKit Agents vs Rasa
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiveKit Agents and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
LiveKit Agents leads on trust — 91.8/100 (Grade A) vs 60.3/100 (Grade C), a 31.5-point gap. Note: LiveKit Agents's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents | RasaRasaHQ/rasa |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 91.8 | 60.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | C |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #5 | #241 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #1 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 14.3k | 21.3k |
| Last updated | today | 59d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.3 / 10 | 5.3 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 791k/wk | 54k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.4 | 9.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.9 | 13.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 8.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.8 | 16.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | — |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →