RegistryCompare › LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent

LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiveKit Agents and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LiveKit Agents leads on trust — 91.8/100 (Grade A) vs 71.2/100 (Grade B), a 20.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score 91.8 71.2
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #5 #132
Rank in Voice & Conversational #1 #3
GitHub stars 13.0k 2.2k
Last updated 3d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 936k/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.6 9.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.0 8.5
Maintenance / 20 19.8 19.9
Adoption / 20 17.8 12.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → LiveKit Agents profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →