LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent
LiveKit Agents leads on trust: 91.6/100 (Grade A) against 86.0/100 (Grade A), a 5.6-point gap. LiveKit Agents leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity.
A framework for building realtime voice AI agents 🤖🎙️📹
Choose LiveKit Agents if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.
- +6.4Adoption: 907.9k weekly downloads against 247
- +1.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 91%
- +0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.2 against 5.5
A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents
Qwen Audio Agent doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiveKit Agents and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents | Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 91.6 | 86.0 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #11 | #71 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #1 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 14.4k | 2.8k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 3d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.2 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 908k/wk | 247/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.2 | 18.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.8 | 13.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.8 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.9 | 11.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →