LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent
LiveKit Agents leads on trust: 92.1/100 (Grade A) against 86.7/100 (Grade A), a 5.4-point gap. LiveKit Agents leads on maintenance and adoption.
A framework for building realtime voice AI agents 🤖🎙️📹
Choose LiveKit Agents if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +6.1Adoption: 1.3M weekly downloads against 536
- +1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago
A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents
Qwen Audio Agent doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiveKit Agents and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents | Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 92.1 | 86.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #11 | #80 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #1 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 15.2k | 3.2k |
| Last updated | today | 3d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.4 / 10 | 6.6 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 1.3M/wk | 536/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.5 | 20.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.9 | 14.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 18.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.2 | 12.1 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →