LiteLLM vs vLLM
vLLM leads on trust: 80.6/100 (Grade A) against 77.6/100 (Grade B), a 3.0-point gap. vLLM leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
The fastest, litest AI Gateway. Rust core with Python SDK. Call 100+ LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format with cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging [Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenAI, VertexAI, vLLM, Nvidia NIM]
LiteLLM doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
A high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs
Choose vLLM if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +0.8Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.7
- +0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.7
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiteLLM and vLLM, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LiteLLMBerriAI/litellm | vLLMvllm-project/vllm |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 77.6 | 80.6 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #237 | #179 |
| Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra | #4 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 63.3k | 96.9k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.7 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 23.7M/wk | 572k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.1 | 12.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 19.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →