LiteLLM vs LLM Gateway
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiteLLM and LLM Gateway, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
LiteLLM leads on trust — 75.6/100 (Grade B) vs 63.7/100 (Grade C), a 11.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | LiteLLMBerriAI/litellm | LLM Gatewaytheopenco/llmgateway |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 75.6 | 63.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #215 | #498 |
| Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra | #3 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 59.1k | 1.6k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.6 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 21.6M/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.1 | 12.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 7.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … | 2 — OpenAI, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →