RegistryCompare › LinkedIn MCP Server vs Stripe Agent Toolkit

LinkedIn MCP Server vs Stripe Agent Toolkit

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LinkedIn MCP Server and Stripe Agent Toolkit, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LinkedIn MCP Server leads on trust — 86.9/100 (Grade A) vs 85.7/100 (Grade A), a 1.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LinkedIn MCP Serverstickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server Stripe Agent Toolkitstripe/ai
HVTrust score 86.9 85.7
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #31 #46
Rank in MCP Servers #5 #7
GitHub stars 3.2k 1.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 6.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 13k/wk 22k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.0 19.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.7 13.6
Maintenance / 20 19.5 17.1
Adoption / 20 13.9 13.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → LinkedIn MCP Server profile Stripe Agent Toolkit profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →