Registry › Compare › LinkedIn MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

LinkedIn MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

Both are Grade A and 2.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. LinkedIn MCP Server leads on maintenance; Playwright MCP leads on adoption.

Open-source MCP server for LinkedIn. Give Claude and any MCP-compatible AI agent access to profiles, companies, jobs, and messages.

stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server · #32 overall · #5 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose LinkedIn MCP Server if maintenance matters most.

  • +3.0Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

Playwright MCP server

microsoft/playwright-mcp · #11 overall · #2 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Playwright MCP if adoption matters most.

  • +5.9Adoption: 9.0M weekly downloads against 13.7k

Where they differ

19.5
Safety / IntegrityPlaywright MCP +0.4
19.9
13.3
TransparencyPlaywright MCP +0.2
13.5
20.0
MaintenanceLinkedIn MCP Server +3.0
17.0
14.1
AdoptionPlaywright MCP +5.9
20.0
+4.2
Runtime calibrationLinkedIn MCP Server +1.0
+3.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LinkedIn MCP Server and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal LinkedIn MCP Serverstickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score 89.1 91.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #32 #11
Rank in MCP Servers #5 #2
GitHub stars 3.8k 38.0k
Last updated today 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10 5.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 14k/wk 9.0M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.5 19.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 17.0
Adoption / 20 14.1 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers — —
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins —
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → LinkedIn MCP Server profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →