RegistryCompare › LightRAG vs Weaviate

LightRAG vs Weaviate

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LightRAG and Weaviate, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LightRAG leads on trust — 84.0/100 (Grade A) vs 75.0/100 (Grade B), a 9.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LightRAGHKUDS/LightRAG Weaviateweaviate/weaviate
HVTrust score 84.0 75.0
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #56 #91
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #5 #8
GitHub stars 38.8k 16.7k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10 6.7 / 10
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Downloads 63k/wk 49.6M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.2 10.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 14.2
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 17.4 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 6 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … 1 — Weaviate
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → LightRAG profile Weaviate profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →