LightRAG vs OpenViking
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LightRAG and OpenViking, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenViking leads on trust — 87.9/100 (Grade A) vs 84.6/100 (Grade A), a 3.3-point gap. Note: OpenViking's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | LightRAGHKUDS/LightRAG | OpenVikingvolcengine/OpenViking |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 84.6 | 87.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #55 | #24 |
| Rank in Memory & Knowledge | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 39.4k | 35.3k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.4 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | 27k/wk | 80k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 17.5 | 20.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.1 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.9 | 17.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 6 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … | 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Firecrawl, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →