Registry › Compare › LibreChat vs OpenUI

LibreChat vs OpenUI

OpenUI leads on trust: 89.0/100 (Grade A) against 73.5/100 (Grade B), a 15.5-point gap. LibreChat leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; OpenUI leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance. Note: OpenUI's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B LibreChat 73.5

Enhanced ChatGPT Clone: Features Agents, MCP, Skills, DeepSeek, Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Responses API, Azure, Groq, o1, GPT-5, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, Gemini, Artifacts, AI model switching, message search, Code Interpreter, langchain, DALL-E-3, OpenAPI Actions, Functions, Secure Multi-User…

LibreChat-AI/LibreChat · #289 overall · #6 UI & App Builders · coverage A (4/5)

Choose LibreChat if adoption matters most.

+2.1Adoption: 637.5k weekly downloads against 133.7k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A OpenUI 89.0

The Open Standard for Generative UI

thesysdev/openui · #43 overall · #2 UI & App Builders · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenUI if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.6Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.1 against 5.0
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none

Where they differ

11.2

Safety / IntegrityOpenUI +7.6

18.8

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenUI +7.2

18.0

18.9

AdoptionLibreChat +2.1

16.8

-0.1

Runtime calibrationOpenUI +2.8

+2.7

2 dimensions identical: Transparency 12.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LibreChat and OpenUI, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	LibreChatLibreChat-AI/LibreChat	OpenUIthesysdev/openui
HVTrust score	73.5	89.0
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#289	#43
Rank in UI & App Builders	#6	#2
GitHub stars	46.7k	14.7k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	5.1 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	637k/wk	134k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.2	18.8
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.8	12.8
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	18.9	16.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → LibreChat profile OpenUI profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →