LeRobot vs RoboOS
LeRobot leads on trust: 90.3/100 (Grade A) against 33.7/100 (Grade D), a 56.6-point gap. LeRobot leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance, and rests on broader evidence.
🤗 LeRobot: Making AI for Robotics more accessible with end-to-end learning
Choose LeRobot if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.
- +20.0Maintenance: last push today, against 307d ago
- +13.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 1.8
- +10.3Adoption: 28.4k GitHub stars against 630
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
🤖 RoboOS: A Universal Embodied Operating System for Cross-Embodied and Multi-Robot Collaboration
RoboOS doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LeRobot and RoboOS, two Robotics & Embodied projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LeRobothuggingface/lerobot | RoboOSFlagOpen/RoboOS |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 90.3 | 33.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | D |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #19 | #1312 |
| Rank in Robotics & Embodied | #1 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 28.4k | 630 |
| Last updated | today | 307d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.8 / 10 | 1.8 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 57k/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.0 | 7.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.3 | 10.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 0.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.0 | 6.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 2 — OpenAI, Redis |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →