Leon vs MaiBot
Both are Grade C and 1.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Leon leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption; MaiBot leads on transparency.
🧠 Leon is your open-source personal assistant.
Choose Leon if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +2.8Safety / Integrity: 81% of recent commits signed, against 7%
- +1.0Adoption: 17.6k GitHub stars against 6.9k
MaiSaka, an LLM-based intelligent agent, is a digital lifeform devoted to understanding you and interacting in the style of a real human. She does not pursue perfection, nor does she seek efficiency; instead, she values warmth, authenticity, and genuine connection.
Choose MaiBot if transparency matters most.
- +0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.2 against 4.5
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Leon and MaiBot, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Leonleon-ai/leon | MaiBotMai-with-u/MaiBot |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 60.3 | 58.7 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #693 | #740 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #6 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 17.6k | 6.9k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.5 / 10 | 5.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.7 | 6.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.3 | 12.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 10.2 | 9.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 5 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Groq, … | 2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →