Registry › Compare › Latitude vs Opik

Latitude vs Opik

Both are Grade B and 1.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Opik leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.

B Latitude 76.9

Open-source observability for AI agents. Find where your agents fail, dispatch your coding agent to fix it, and verify the fix against real traces.

latitude-dev/latitude-llm · #210 overall · #8 Observability & Evaluation · coverage B (3/5)

Latitude doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

B Opik 78.5

Debug, evaluate, and monitor your LLM applications, RAG systems, and agentic workflows with comprehensive tracing, automated evaluations, and production-ready dashboards.

comet-ml/opik · #185 overall · #7 Observability & Evaluation · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Opik if adoption matters most.

+4.2Adoption: 441.1k weekly downloads against 5.4k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

12.0

Safety / IntegrityOpik +0.2

12.2

13.8

AdoptionOpik +4.2

18.0

+4.7

Runtime calibrationLatitude +2.8

+1.9

3 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Transparency 8.5 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Latitude and Opik, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Latitudelatitude-dev/latitude-llm	Opikcomet-ml/opik
HVTrust score	76.9	78.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#210	#185
Rank in Observability & Evaluation	#8	#7
GitHub stars	4.7k	22.5k
Last updated	2d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	—	—
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	5k/wk	441k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.0	12.2
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	8.5	8.5
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	13.8	18.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Partial

Open in the live compare tool → Latitude profile Opik profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →