Registry › Compare › Latitude vs OpenLLMetry

Latitude vs OpenLLMetry

OpenLLMetry leads on trust: 86.0/100 (Grade A) against 76.9/100 (Grade B), a 9.1-point gap. Latitude leads on maintenance; OpenLLMetry leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

B Latitude 76.9

Open-source observability for AI agents. Find where your agents fail, dispatch your coding agent to fix it, and verify the fix against real traces.

latitude-dev/latitude-llm · #210 overall · #8 Observability & Evaluation · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Latitude if maintenance matters most.

+3.7Maintenance: last push 2d ago, against 5d ago

A OpenLLMetry 86.0

Open-source observability for your GenAI or LLM application, based on OpenTelemetry

traceloop/openllmetry · #74 overall · #3 Observability & Evaluation · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenLLMetry if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+7.7Safety / Integrity
+5.5Transparency
+3.0Adoption: 442k weekly downloads against 5.4k

Where they differ

12.0

Safety / IntegrityOpenLLMetry +7.7

19.7

8.5

TransparencyOpenLLMetry +5.5

14.0

19.9

MaintenanceLatitude +3.7

16.2

13.8

AdoptionOpenLLMetry +3.0

16.8

+4.7

Runtime calibrationLatitude +3.4

+1.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Latitude and OpenLLMetry, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Latitudelatitude-dev/latitude-llm	OpenLLMetrytraceloop/openllmetry
HVTrust score	76.9	86.0
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#210	#74
Rank in Observability & Evaluation	#8	#3
GitHub stars	4.7k	7.5k
Last updated	2d ago	5d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	—	6.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	5k/wk	442k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.0	19.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	8.5	14.0
Maintenance / 20	19.9	16.2
Adoption / 20	13.8	16.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	9 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Latitude profile OpenLLMetry profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →