Larksuite Cli vs OmniRoute
Both are Grade A and 3.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. OmniRoute leads on maintenance and adoption.
The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.
Larksuite Cli doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Never stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 359 providers (150+ free), 1200+ models Kimi, Claude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A…
Choose OmniRoute if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +2.1Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 2d ago
- +1.2Adoption: 75k GitHub stars against 17.6k
- +0.6Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.5 against 6.0
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Larksuite Cli and OmniRoute, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli | OmniRoutediegosouzapw/OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.9 | 92.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #4 | #1 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #4 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 17.6k | 75.0k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.0 / 10 | 6.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 77k/wk | 44k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.0 | 20.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.6 | 14.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.8 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.7 | 17.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →