Langfuse vs Latitude
Both are Grade B and 2.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Langfuse leads on transparency and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Latitude leads on provenance.
🪢 Open source agent evals & observability: Trace, evaluate, and improve LLM applications with one open platform.
Choose Langfuse if transparency and adoption matter most.
- +6.2Adoption: 6.4M weekly downloads against 5.4k
- +6.0Transparency
- +1.8Safety / Integrity: 98% of recent commits signed, against 91%
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Open-source observability for AI agents. Find where your agents fail, dispatch your coding agent to fix it, and verify the fix against real traces.
Choose Latitude if provenance matters most.
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Langfuse and Latitude, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Langfuselangfuse/langfuse | Latitudelatitude-dev/latitude-llm |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 79.2 | 76.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #171 | #210 |
| Rank in Observability & Evaluation | #6 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 35.6k | 4.7k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.1 / 10 | — |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Downloads | 6.4M/wk | 5k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.5 | 8.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 13.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →