Langflow vs n8n
n8n leads on trust: 90.1/100 (Grade A) against 79.3/100 (Grade B), a 10.8-point gap. n8n leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.
Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.
Langflow doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
Choose n8n if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +7.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.8 against 5.7
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
- +2.3Adoption: 267.2M weekly downloads against 8.6k
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Langflow and n8n, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Langflowlangflow-ai/langflow | n8nn8n-io/n8n |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 79.3 | 90.1 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #159 | #18 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #5 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 155.5k | 206.6k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.7 / 10 | 5.8 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 9k/wk | 267.2M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.1 | 19.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 13.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.7 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Postgres | 6 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Pinecone, … |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →