RegistryCompare › Kubernetes MCP Server vs XcodeBuildMCP

Kubernetes MCP Server vs XcodeBuildMCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Kubernetes MCP Server and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

XcodeBuildMCP leads on trust — 86.3/100 (Grade A) vs 84.6/100 (Grade A), a 1.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Kubernetes MCP ServerFlux159/mcp-server-kubernetes XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
HVTrust score 84.6 86.3
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #40 #30
Rank in MCP Servers #6 #4
GitHub stars 1.5k 6.2k
Last updated 6d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 15k/wk 65k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.4 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 12.9
Maintenance / 20 18.3 18.0
Adoption / 20 13.2 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Kubernetes MCP Server profile XcodeBuildMCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →