RegistryCompare › Kubernetes MCP Server vs Openzim MCP

Kubernetes MCP Server vs Openzim MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Kubernetes MCP Server and Openzim MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Kubernetes MCP Server and Openzim MCP are tied on HVTrust at 82.6/100. Full breakdown below.
Signal Kubernetes MCP ServerFlux159/mcp-server-kubernetes Openzim MCPcameronrye/openzim-mcp
HVTrust score 82.6 82.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #61 #62
Rank in MCP Servers #6 #7
GitHub stars 1.6k 117
Last updated 14d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 15k/wk 626/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.3 18.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.2 13.1
Maintenance / 20 15.9 18.9
Adoption / 20 13.2 8.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Google Gemini
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Kubernetes MCP Server profile Openzim MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →