Registry › Compare › KiCad MCP Pro vs Supabase MCP Server

KiCad MCP Pro vs Supabase MCP Server

Both are Grade A and 0.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. KiCad MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance; Supabase MCP Server leads on adoption.

A KiCad MCP Pro 88.9

MCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.

oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro · #33 overall · #7 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose KiCad MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+3.4Maintenance: last push today, against 2d ago
+3.1Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 88%
+1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 6.5

A Supabase MCP Server 88.1

Connect Supabase to your AI assistants

supabase/mcp · #40 overall · #8 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Supabase MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+4.8Adoption: 67.9k weekly downloads against 5.7k

Where they differ

23.1

Safety / IntegrityKiCad MCP Pro +3.1

20.0

15.7

TransparencyKiCad MCP Pro +1.7

14.0

20.0

MaintenanceKiCad MCP Pro +3.4

16.6

10.0

AdoptionSupabase MCP Server +4.8

14.8

+2.1

Runtime calibrationSupabase MCP Server +2.6

+4.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of KiCad MCP Pro and Supabase MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro	Supabase MCP Serversupabase/mcp
HVTrust score	88.9	88.1
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#33	#40
Rank in MCP Servers	#7	#8
GitHub stars	122	2.9k
Last updated	today	2d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	8.5 / 10	6.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	6k/wk	68k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	23.1	20.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	15.7	14.0
Maintenance / 20	20.0	16.6
Adoption / 20	10.0	14.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	1 — Supabase
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → KiCad MCP Pro profile Supabase MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →