RegistryCompare › KiCad MCP Pro vs Playwright MCP

KiCad MCP Pro vs Playwright MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of KiCad MCP Pro and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Playwright MCP leads on trust — 89.5/100 (Grade A) vs 83.7/100 (Grade A), a 5.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score 83.7 89.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #57 #15
Rank in MCP Servers #7 #2
GitHub stars 48 36.0k
Last updated today 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 6.1 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 2k/wk 6.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.5 20.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.7
Maintenance / 20 20.0 13.7
Adoption / 20 8.6 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → KiCad MCP Pro profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →