Registry › Compare › KiCad MCP Pro vs Mongodb MCP Server

KiCad MCP Pro vs Mongodb MCP Server

Both score 88.5/100, so choose on what you weigh most. KiCad MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Mongodb MCP Server leads on adoption.

A KiCad MCP Pro 88.5

MCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.

oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro · #52 overall · #13 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose KiCad MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

  • +3.4Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 96%
  • +2.2Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 5.9
  • +1.4Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

A Model Context Protocol server to connect to MongoDB databases and MongoDB Atlas Clusters.

mongodb-js/mongodb-mcp-server · #54 overall · #14 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mongodb MCP Server if adoption matters most.

  • +4.5Adoption: 821k weekly downloads against 8.4k

Where they differ

23.1
Safety / IntegrityKiCad MCP Pro +3.4
19.7
15.7
TransparencyKiCad MCP Pro +2.2
13.5
20.0
MaintenanceKiCad MCP Pro +1.4
18.6
10.7
AdoptionMongodb MCP Server +4.5
15.2
+1.0
Runtime calibrationMongodb MCP Server +2.5
+3.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of KiCad MCP Pro and Mongodb MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro Mongodb MCP Servermongodb-js/mongodb-mcp-server
HVTrust score 88.5 88.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #52 #54
Rank in MCP Servers #13 #14
GitHub stars 190 1.2k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.5 / 10 5.9 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 8k/wk 821k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 23.1 19.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.7 13.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.6
Adoption / 20 10.7 15.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … —
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins —
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → KiCad MCP Pro profile Mongodb MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →