Jan vs LLM Gateway
Both are Grade C and 0.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Jan leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; LLM Gateway leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Jan is an open source alternative to ChatGPT that runs 100% offline on your computer.
Choose Jan if adoption matters most.
- +3.4Adoption: 45.3k GitHub stars against 1.7k
- B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2
Route, manage, and analyze your LLM requests across multiple providers with a unified API interface.
Choose LLM Gateway if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +2.1Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 4.6
- +1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 4.6
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Jan and LLM Gateway, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Janjanhq/jan | LLM Gatewaytheopenco/llmgateway |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 64.2 | 63.8 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #547 | #561 |
| Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra | #6 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 45.3k | 1.7k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.6 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.8 | 12.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.4 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.2 | 7.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Declared |
| External providers | — | 2 — OpenAI, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | — |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →