RegistryCompare › Instructor vs vLLM

Instructor vs vLLM

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Instructor and vLLM, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

vLLM leads on trust — 81.4/100 (Grade A) vs 66.9/100 (Grade B), a 14.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Instructor567-labs/instructor vLLMvllm-project/vllm
HVTrust score 66.9 81.4
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #155 #67
Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra #4 #1
GitHub stars 13.9k 92.3k
Last updated 3d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 6.8 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 1.9M/wk 409k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 8.8 13.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 14.3
Maintenance / 20 19.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.3 19.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 11 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Instructor profile vLLM profile More LLM Gateways & Infra →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →