Hypit vs Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev leads on trust: 87.9/100 (Grade A) against 75.6/100 (Grade B), a 12.3-point gap. Trigger.dev leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.
Hypit doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Choose Trigger.dev if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +5.7Safety / Integrity
- +5.1Transparency
- +2.7Adoption: 1.1M weekly downloads against 10k
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hypit and Trigger.dev, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Hypithypit-ai/hypit | Trigger.devtriggerdotdev/trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 75.6 | 87.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #217 | #42 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #6 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 17.5k | 16.4k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | — | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 10k/wk | 1.1M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.0 | 15.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 8.5 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.5 | 18.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →