Registry › Compare › Hypit vs Trigger.dev

Hypit vs Trigger.dev

Trigger.dev leads on trust: 87.1/100 (Grade A) against 67.5/100 (Grade B), a 19.6-point gap. Trigger.dev leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

B Hypit 67.5

Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.

hypit-ai/hypit · #451 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Hypit doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Trigger.dev 87.1

Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows

triggerdotdev/trigger.dev · #74 overall · #3 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Trigger.dev if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 5.0
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+3.5Maintenance
+2.1Adoption: 1.5M weekly downloads against 15k

Where they differ

7.2

Safety / IntegrityTrigger.dev +7.9

15.1

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceTrigger.dev +7.2

18.0

12.8

TransparencyTrigger.dev +0.8

13.6

16.4

MaintenanceTrigger.dev +3.5

19.9

16.3

AdoptionTrigger.dev +2.1

18.4

+4.0

Runtime calibrationHypit +1.9

+2.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hypit and Trigger.dev, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Hypithypit-ai/hypit	Trigger.devtriggerdotdev/trigger.dev
HVTrust score	67.5	87.1
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#451	#74
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#8	#3
GitHub stars	29.9k	16.8k
Last updated	1d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	6.0 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	Apache-2.0
Downloads	15k/wk	1.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.2	15.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.8	13.6
Maintenance / 20	16.4	19.9
Adoption / 20	16.3	18.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	—	4 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Hypit profile Trigger.dev profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →