Registry › Compare › Hypit vs n8n

Hypit vs n8n

n8n leads on trust: 90.2/100 (Grade A) against 67.5/100 (Grade B), a 22.7-point gap. n8n leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

B Hypit 67.5

Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.

hypit-ai/hypit · #451 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Hypit doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A n8n 90.2

Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.

n8n-io/n8n · #28 overall · #1 Workflow Platforms · coverage A (4/5)

Choose n8n if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+13.7Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 19%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+3.7Adoption: 285.5M weekly downloads against 15k
+3.6Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

7.2

Safety / Integrityn8n +13.7

20.9

10.8

Identity / Provenancen8n +7.2

18.0

12.8

Transparencyn8n +1.4

14.2

16.4

Maintenancen8n +3.6

20.0

16.3

Adoptionn8n +3.7

20.0

+4.0

Runtime calibrationHypit +6.9

-2.9

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hypit and n8n, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Hypithypit-ai/hypit	n8nn8n-io/n8n
HVTrust score	67.5	90.2
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#451	#28
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#8	#1
GitHub stars	29.9k	210.5k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	6.7 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	15k/wk	285.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.2	20.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.8	14.2
Maintenance / 20	16.4	20.0
Adoption / 20	16.3	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	—	6 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Pinecone, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Hypit profile n8n profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →