RegistryCompare › HOL Guard vs REA

HOL Guard vs REA

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of HOL Guard and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

HOL Guard leads on trust — 88.4/100 (Grade A) vs 78.9/100 (Grade B), a 9.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal HOL Guardhashgraph-online/hol-guard REAmorluto/rea
HVTrust score 88.4 78.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #28 #149
Rank in Security & Guardrails #1 #4
GitHub stars 572 398
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 5.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 34k/wk 528/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.6 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.4 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.4
Adoption / 20 12.7 9.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → HOL Guard profile REA profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →