RegistryCompare › HOL Guard vs REA

HOL Guard vs REA

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of HOL Guard and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

HOL Guard leads on trust — 88.5/100 (Grade A) vs 71.1/100 (Grade B), a 17.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal HOL Guardhashgraph-online/hol-guard REAmorluto/rea
HVTrust score 88.5 71.1
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #20 #133
Rank in Security & Guardrails #1 #5
GitHub stars 437 334
Last updated 1d ago 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 30k/wk 528/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.7 9.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 8.5
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.8
Adoption / 20 12.3 9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → HOL Guard profile REA profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →