Registry › Compare › Hermes Agent vs Qwen Code

Hermes Agent vs Qwen Code

Both are Grade A and 4.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Hermes Agent leads on transparency and adoption; Qwen Code leads on supply-chain integrity and rests on broader evidence.

A Hermes Agent 83.9

The agent that grows with you

nousresearch/hermes-agent · #109 overall · #7 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Hermes Agent if transparency and adoption matter most.

  • +1.5Adoption: 259.9k GitHub stars against 28.9k
  • +0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.4
A Qwen Code 88.6

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

QwenLM/qwen-code · #53 overall · #4 Coding Agents · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Qwen Code if supply-chain integrity matters most.

  • +3.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 1%
  • A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

15.4
Safety / IntegrityQwen Code +3.8
19.2
13.9
TransparencyHermes Agent +0.8
13.1
19.1
AdoptionHermes Agent +1.5
17.6
-2.5
Runtime calibrationQwen Code +3.2
+0.7

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hermes Agent and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Hermes Agentnousresearch/hermes-agent Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code
HVTrust score 83.9 88.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #109 #53
Rank in Coding Agents #7 #4
GitHub stars 259.9k 28.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 36k/wk 145k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.4 19.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.9 13.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.1 17.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, ElevenLabs, … 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Hermes Agent profile Qwen Code profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →