RegistryCompare › Hermes Agent vs Qwen Code

Hermes Agent vs Qwen Code

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hermes Agent and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Qwen Code leads on trust — 87.9/100 (Grade A) vs 83.9/100 (Grade A), a 4.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Hermes Agentnousresearch/hermes-agent Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code
HVTrust score 83.9 87.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #95 #38
Rank in Coding Agents #9 #5
GitHub stars 246.9k 28.0k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 4.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 35k/wk 53k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.3 18.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.8 12.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 19.0 17.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, ElevenLabs, … 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Hermes Agent profile Qwen Code profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →