RegistryCompare › Headroom vs Jan

Headroom vs Jan

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Headroom and Jan, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Headroom leads on trust — 87.2/100 (Grade A) vs 66.4/100 (Grade B), a 20.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Headroomchopratejas/headroom Janjanhq/jan
HVTrust score 87.2 66.4
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #22 #138
Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra #2 #5
GitHub stars 64.7k 43.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 208k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.5 12.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.7 13.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.6 11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, … 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Partial
Open in the live compare tool → Headroom profile Jan profile More LLM Gateways & Infra →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →