Hatchet vs Langflow
Langflow leads on trust: 78.8/100 (Grade B) against 67.2/100 (Grade B), a 11.6-point gap. Hatchet leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Langflow leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.
🪓 An orchestration engine for background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows
Choose Hatchet if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +0.8Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.5
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.5
Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.
Choose Langflow if adoption matters most.
- +8.4Adoption: 155.6k GitHub stars against 8.1k
- A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hatchet and Langflow, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Hatchethatchet-dev/hatchet | Langflowlangflow-ai/langflow |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 67.2 | 78.8 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #437 | #185 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #8 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 8.1k | 155.6k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.3 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | — | 9k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.7 | 11.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.9 | 13.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.4 | 17.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, … | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →